Indeed, the goal of the editing option in DaVinci Resolve 12 was to simplify cutting and round-tripping gaps before going to the grading phase in the software. None of them has considered cutting on Resolve. Furthermore, Professional editors continued to use FCPX, PP, and Avid.
Nobody expected that it would become a powerful editing suite since Resolve 12 tended to crashes a lot compares to Premiere. When Resolve 12 came out, it was pretty exciting because for the first time it contained some limited editing capabilities. For color grading, most of the editors started to use DaVinci Resolve and performed round-tripping between their NLE and Resolve. Premiere seemed like a good option, robust, friendly GUI(Graphical User Interface), and a very responsive platform. I remember most of my fellow editors used Premiere because everyone was furious about the magnetic timeline and the unique interface of FCPX. I stuck to it because it was pretty straightforward from a user experience point of view.įurthermore, FCPX was (and still is) very fast. Then came FCPX with the controversial magnetic timeline. I remember back in the days when I edited FullHD ProRes files transcoded from H.264. Well, one is a dominant NLE and the other is a rising star. It seems that this is the case between two significant NLEs (Non-Linear Editing). The universe has limited resources and thus must divide them. Should PP loyal users switch to Resolve? Resolve vs Premiere: Interface comparison On the other hand, DaVinci Resolve 16 has become a real professional NLE alternative. It’s not a secret that Adobe Premiere Pro suffers from crashing issues and critical bugs.
0 kommentar(er)
